Arguments for and against drug prohibition

Commonly-cited arguments for and against the prohibition of drugs include the following: == Efficiency == === Arguments that drug laws are effective === Supporters of prohibition claim that drug laws have a successful track record suppressing illicit drug use since they were introduced in the 1910s. The licit drug alcohol has current (last 12 months) user rates as high as 80–90% in populations over 14 years of age, and tobacco has historically had current use rates up to 60% of adult populations, yet the percentages currently using illicit drugs in OECD countries are generally below 1% of the population excepting cannabis where most are between 3% and 10%, with six countries between 11% and 17%.

Source: Wikipedia — Arguments for and against drug prohibition (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Arguments for and against drug prohibition

Commonly-cited arguments for and against the prohibition of drugs include the following: == Efficiency == === Arguments that drug laws are effective === Supporters of prohibition claim that drug laws have a successful track record suppressing illicit drug use since they were introduced in the 1910s. The licit drug alcohol has current (last 12 months) user rates as high as 80–90% in populations over 14 years of age, and tobacco has historically had current use rates up to 60% of adult populations, yet the percentages currently using illicit drugs in OECD countries are generally below 1% of the population excepting cannabis where most are between 3% and 10%, with six countries between 11% and 17%.

Source: Wikipedia "Arguments for and against drug prohibition" · CC BY-SA 4.0

Share this article: X · Bluesky
Privacy Policy