Cadder v HM Advocate

Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) is a decision in which the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that the way in which police in Scotland detained suspects was not compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and was therefore unlawful in terms of the Scotland Act 1998. == Background == Peter Cadder was convicted at Glasgow Sheriff Court of assault and breach of the peace on 29 May 2009, following an incident in May 2007, at which time he was a minor.

Source: Wikipedia — Cadder v HM Advocate (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Cadder v HM Advocate

Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) is a decision in which the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that the way in which police in Scotland detained suspects was not compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and was therefore unlawful in terms of the Scotland Act 1998. == Background == Peter Cadder was convicted at Glasgow Sheriff Court of assault and breach of the peace on 29 May 2009, following an incident in May 2007, at which time he was a minor.

Source: Wikipedia "Cadder v HM Advocate" · CC BY-SA 4.0

Share this article: X · Bluesky
Privacy Policy