Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia

Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia, is a High Court of Australia case that deals with whether a particular Act of South Australia contravenes Section 92 of the Constitution of Australia, which is about the freedom of interstate trade. == Background == The Beverage Container Act 1975 (SA) required a mandatory deposit of 5 cents per bottle, which would be refunded when they were returned; refillable bottles were exempt from this deposit.

Source: Wikipedia — Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia

Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia, is a High Court of Australia case that deals with whether a particular Act of South Australia contravenes Section 92 of the Constitution of Australia, which is about the freedom of interstate trade. == Background == The Beverage Container Act 1975 (SA) required a mandatory deposit of 5 cents per bottle, which would be refunded when they were returned; refillable bottles were exempt from this deposit.

Source: Wikipedia "Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia" · CC BY-SA 4.0

Share this article: X · Bluesky
Privacy Policy