Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection was a case heard by the High Court of Australia at the same time as Te Puia v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, which held that section 503A of the Migration Act 1958 is invalid to the extent that s 503A(2)(c) would apply to prevent the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection from being required to divulge or communicate certain information to the High Court or Federal Court. == Background == The plaintiff in Graham was Aaron Graham; the applicant in Te Puia was Mehaka Te Puia.

Source: Wikipedia — Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection was a case heard by the High Court of Australia at the same time as Te Puia v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, which held that section 503A of the Migration Act 1958 is invalid to the extent that s 503A(2)(c) would apply to prevent the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection from being required to divulge or communicate certain information to the High Court or Federal Court. == Background == The plaintiff in Graham was Aaron Graham; the applicant in Te Puia was Mehaka Te Puia.

This neuron ends here.

Source: Wikipedia "Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection" · CC BY-SA 4.0

Share this article: X · Bluesky
Privacy Policy