Routledge v McKay is a 1954 English contract law case, concerning the difference between a term and a representation. == Facts == The claimant bought a 1936 Douglas motorcycle outfit in a part-exchange deal which required him to pay a balance of £30.
Routledge v McKay is a 1954 English contract law case, concerning the difference between a term and a representation. == Facts == The claimant bought a 1936 Douglas motorcycle outfit in a part-exchange deal which required him to pay a balance of £30.
Source: Wikipedia "Routledge v McKay" · CC BY-SA 4.0
Share this article: X · Bluesky